WHY THE HECK IS GREAT BRITAIN AND USA NOT PUTTING A STOP TO ITS PRODUCTION PROGRAMS.
THEY ARE THE WORLD LEADERS OF EVIL AND EXAMPLES THEREOF AND MUST NOW CHANGE AND BECOME EXAMPLES OF GOOD!!!THEN CAN THEY POINT FINGER AT OTHER COUNTRIES! I AM DEFINITLY NOT CONDONING THAT OTHER COUNTRIES SHOULD ALSO BE COPYING THESE EVIL MASTERS OF DOOM & DESTRUCTION AND CHAOS!

WHAT A BLOODY WASTE OF MONEY, TECHNICAL & SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE, TIME, LAND, AIR, MURDERS AND MAIMING OF MINERS FOR THIS URANIUM RUBBISH, etc. WITH SO MUCH POVERTY AND JOBLESSNESS AND OVER-POPULATION IN CERTAIN COUNTRIES AND CRIME WORLDWIDE.

WHERE ARE THEIR MORALS?
WHERE ARE THEIR ETHICS?
THIS IS ALL, BECAUSE THEY ARE GODLESS, AND THINK THAT THEY AND THEIR REGIMES WHICH ARE AUTHORIZING THESE PROJECTS, ARE gods. IF SO THEN I SAY: THEY ARE INDEED gods, but gods OF EVIL AND MASS DESTRUCTION!

THEY ARE DEFINITLY, THE MANIC, PSYCHOTIC, PSYCHOPATHS OF THE UNIVERSE AND MUST BE CONTROLLED BY SATAN, IT SEEMS!

IN THE NAME OF JESUS, I SAY STOP NOW, BECAUSE ALL OF YOUR PROPERTIES AND MONIES WILL HAVE TO BE CONFISCATED AND THAT OF ALL OF THE CORPORATIONS INVOLVED AND WHO HAVE BEEN BENEFITTING HEREOF SINCE 1904 TO-DATE, ARE NOW TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE AND RESPONSIBLE AS WELL AND PAY REPARATIONS FOR ALL OF THE VICTIMS AND THEIR RELATIVES AND TO THE COFFERS OF SOCIETY FOR THE FUNDS TO FIGHT CRIME AND REBUILD A BETTER FUTURE AND PROPER & DECENT EDUCATION FACILITIES OR ACCESS TO THE INFORMATION FOR EDUCATION AND THEN THOSE WHO DO NOT HAVE MONEY TO ATTEND DECENT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, MAY THEN BE ABLE TO DO SO ON THEIR OWN.

THIS PROBLEM OF WASTE MATERIALS, ESPECIALLY TOXIC WASTE NEEDS URGENT ADDRESSING TOO -SO THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH WORK AVAILABLE [MY POR FINGERS SO PAINFUL] FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS TO BE APPLYING THEIR MINDS TO DECENT PROJECTS THAT ALSO INCLUDES WATER MANUFACTURING, OBTAINING, DISTRIBUTION, SEEING WHAT THE SEA WATERS CAN BE USED FOR, ESPECIALLY REGARDING THE DR REGION OF THE WORLD – AFRIKA IN PARTICULAR AND STOP DEPLETING AND INTERFERRING WITH THE POLES – N & S AND YOUR DAMNED POLLUTION OF THE EARTH.

MONEY CAN BE USED CONSTRUCTIVELY AND NOT DESTRUCTIVELY AND IN THIS I INCLUDE ALL OF THE ARMANANTS AND ALSO THE PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANIES AS WELL.

IF I/WE HAVE CANCER, ARTHRITIS, etc – IT IS THEIR FAULT AND I/WE DO NOT NEED THEIR FURTHER DAMNED TOXINS TO SUPPOSEDLY “CURE” US EITHER!

STOP INCARCERATING AND TERRORIZING DIV [DECENT, INNOCENT AND VULNERABLE VICTIMS OF YOUR AND STREET GANGSTER CRIMINAL'S CRIMES!

USE MY MONIES THAT YOU ALSO OWE ME, FOR GOOD PURPOSES AND NOT EVIL ONES AND TO FIGHT THE CRIMINALS, BECAUSE I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS HELL ON EARTH - IT HAS BEEN 'CARRYING ON' FOR FAR TOO LONG NOW AND HAND IN ALL OF YOUR MAN-MADE WEAPONS, INCLUDING MACHETTES, KNIVES, etc.

AND AS FOR ALL THE BILLIONAIRES WORLDWIDE, MOST ESPECIALLY THE ONES WHO HAVE BECOME SO DUE TO CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, YOU MUST ALSO HAND IN THOSE PROCEEDS TO BE USED FOR ALL OF MY DECENT AND GOOD PROJECTS WORLDWIDE!

IT'S NOW OR NEVER........

THE MUSIC'S NO GOOD WITHOUT YOU, BABY THE MUSIC'S NO GOOD AT ALL, THE MUSIC'S NO GOOD WITHOUT YOU, BABY...........[CHER]

THIS IS A SONG FOR THE LONELY,
CAN YOU HEAR ME TONIGHT,
FOR THE BROKEN-HEARTED, THE BATTLE-SCARRED – I’LL BE BY YOUR SIDE……..[CHER]

PSALM 140
RESCUE ME H LORD, FROM EVIL MEN;
KEEP ME SAFE FROM VIOLENT MEN & WOMEN
WHOSE HEADS ARE FULL OF WICKED SCHEMES, WHO STIR UP CONTENTION, DAY AFTER DAY………

I CANNOT FIND ANYTHING CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL BANK OF SOUTHERN AFRICA. THIS IS RATHER QUESTIONABLE, BECAUSE WHEN I WAS THERE IN 1998, ALL THAT I KNOW ABOUT IT WAS THAT IT HAD BEEN IN EXISTANCE FOR TWELVE YEARS ALREADY, BUT I HAD NEVER EVEN HEARD ABOUT IT BEFORE, AND THEN I WAS PHOTOGRAPHED WITHOUT MY PERMISSION AND MY IMAGE PLACED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1997 AND DISTRIBUTED TO OVER 35 MERCHANT BANKS WORLDWIDE, INCLUDING NEDCOR, AND THAT IT WAS SET UP IN PARTNERSHIP OF DRESDNER BANK AG, BANK NASIONAAL DE PARIS [BNP] AND BANK OF BRUSSELS AND THAT NIGEL PAALMER WAS THE MANAGING DIRECT, AND HE NEVER EVEN USED TO GREET ME, MR.Gunter Z. Steffens, {Gunter has been the Group Representative for Southern Africa of Dresdner Bank AG in Johannesburg since 1993}, OR DR. DENIS WORRAL, WAS THE CHAIRMAN AND THAT AFTER I HAD BEEN CONSTRUCTIVELY, IMMORALLY, UNETHICALLY AND UNFAIRLY DISMISSED SOON THEREAFTER, THEY WERE ALLOWED TO NOT EVEN BE PRESENT OR REPRESENTED AT THE LABOUR COURT HEARING AND JUDGE LANDMAN DID NOT EVEN RULE IN MY FAVOUR – SO WHAT CORRUPTION IS INVOLVED, WHEREBY CERTAIN WEALTHY CORPORATIONS AND ESPECIALLY THESE INTERNATIONAL ONES, ARE ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH MURDER, AND VIOLATIONS OF BASIC INTERNATIONAL LABOUR LAWS AND PRACTICES AND HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS ABUSES, SYSTEMATICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY – SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY ARE A PART OF AND AGENTS OF THE GREAT BRITISH CORRUPT ESTABLISHMENTS?

IS THIS ALSO A CONNECTION AS TO WHY I WAS ALSO HARASSED AND TERRORIZED IN LONDON IN 1984 AND 5 AND AS I WAS LEAVING HEATHROW AIRPORT, THEN BY BRITISH AGENTS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND FOUND IN 2003, THAT THEY HAD EVEN DECLARED ME AS DECEASED ON THE BRITISH NATIONAL RECORDS DATABASE AND THEN IN 2004, I DISCOVERED THAT THE BRITISH DR. MENGELE’S HAD EVEN WRITTEN ON MY MEDICAL REPORTS OF GROSS UNTRUTHS, THAT I WAS “MENTAL SINCE 1985″, THAT BEING. SINCE WHEN I HAD LEFT THE UK AND RETURNED TO SOUTH AFRICA, BU BECAUSE OF THE SEVERE SURVEILLANCING AND BUGGING, I HAD EVEN GONE TO THE SOUTH AFRICAN EMBASSY, WHERE MR. DENIS WORRAL WAS THE EMBASSADOR, AND ASKED THEM WHETHER I WAS TO BE ARRESTED ON ARRIVAL IN SOUTH AFRICA, DUE TO ALL OF THIS SURVEILLANCING AND HARASSMENT, ELECTRONICALLY AS WELL, SO THAT I COULD INFORM SOMEBODY IN SA AND BE PREPARED TO BE ARRESTED FOR WHAT – I DO NOT KNOW!?

I ALSO SAW A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, THAT INTERNATIONAL BANK DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE – WHY NOT? AND THAT MR. WORRAL HAD STARTED ANOTHER VENTURE CALLED OMEGA INVESTMENTS, etc AND I STILL DO NOT SEE ANY SOUTH AFRICAN REPRESENTATION IN HIS INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION AGAIN AND WHAT IS THIS SINISTER ST. JAMES’S COURT BUSINESS ALL ABOUT – I WANT TO KNOW, BECAUSE WE BELIEVE IN TRANSPARENCY, WHERE MATTER AND PERSONS OF PUBLIC INTEREST AND WORK – AS IN HIS CASE, HE WAS A POLITICIAN AND INVOLVED IN INTERNATIONAL BANKING AND CONSULTING, etc, HENCE TOO IS A PUBLIC FIGURE – SO WHY ALL OF THE SECRECY???

I THANK YOU.

=================================

OH THERE ERE TWO JEWISH CHARACTERS WHO GAVE ME GRIEF TOO, THEY WERE DAVID HEATH, WHO WAS A LONDON COCKNEY BRITISH AGENT, WHO HAD ARRANGED AN APPOINTMENT FOR ME IN 1986 AT JCI WITH STEVE FAZEKAS [HUNGARIAN AMERICAN], BUT WHEN I MET HIM DOWNSTAIRS AT RECEPTION HE ASKED ME FOR MY COPIES OF MY OIL-RIGG DIAGRAMS I HAD DRAWN IN LONDON, BUT I TOLD HIM THAT I HAD TORN THEM UP AND THROWN THEM AWAY [THIS WAS DUE TO THE PSYCHOPATHS, TAPPING MY TELEPHONE, BUGGING & THEIR ZEPPELIN-SHAPED CRAFT, HOVERING ABOVE MY FLAT IN WAPPING, A FEW DAYS BEFORE I THEN DECIDED TO RATHER LEAVE WITH MY BABIES FOR SA.

DAVID THEN SAID TO ME THAT "WELL, HE WILL NOT SEE YOU THEN." I SAID, "I WANT TO SEE HIM, SO YOU JUST TELL HIM THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE HIM, BECAUSE MY INTERVIEW IS WITH HIM AND NOT WITH YOU." THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME THAT I HAD MET DAVID HEATH, BUT I WAS GIVEN HIS NAME AND NUMBER BY ANOTHER BRITISH COLLEAGUE AT THE SMALL ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY A FEW STREETS AWAY FROM JCI, WHERE I WAS VERY BORED AS THEY HAD NO DRAWINGS FOR ME TO DO AS YET.

I THEN, VERY RELUCTANTLY, ASKED THE SECURITY GUARD TO CALL STEVE ON THE PHONE AND THEN I HEARD HIM SAY TO STEVE "STEVE, I HAVE HER HERE AT RECEPTION, BUT SHE SAYS THAT SHE HAD TORN THE DRAWINGS UP AND WILL NOT LEAVE BECAUSE SHE WANTS TO SEE YOU."

WE THEN TOOK THE LIFT UPSTAIRS AND THIS VERY HANDSOME AND DECENT MAN THEN SAW HOW I WAS DRESSED, WHAT A FEW ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS COPIES OF MINE 'S QUALITY WAS, AND HOW SERIOUS I WAS AND HE TOTALLY IGNORED DAVID THROUGHOUT THE INTERVIEW, EVEN TELLING ME STRAIGHT WHAT RATE HE WAS OFFERING ME AND ASKED IF I COULD START THE FOLLOWING DAY, AFTER HE HAD WALKED OVER TO A SIDE TABLE IN HIS OFFICE [& THIS WAS THE VERY BUILDING THAT I HAD NEVER SEEN PREVIOUSLY IN MY LIFE, BUT ONLY IN A PREMONITION I HAD HAD IN MY FLAT IN VANCOUVER HOUSE, WAPPING ABOUT SIX MONTHS BEFORE, AND WHEN I HAD NO PLANS TO RETURN TO SA AS YET.

STEVE ASKED ME A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DRAWINGS, BUT I WAS SO ACCURATE AND CORRECT, DESPITE NOT HAVING SEEN P&ID's AND FLOW DIAGRAMS IN MY LIFE BEFORE EITHER, AND IN LONDON, AT CONSAFE OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY, AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTRE - WAS ALSO THE VERY FIRST TIME THAT I HAD EVER SEEN DRAWINGS OF OIL-RIGGS. SO, IN OTHER WORDS, AFTER I HAD BEEN TO THE INTERVIEW AT COUNTY HALL AND SHOWN THEM MY ELECTRICAL AND OIL-RIGG DIAGRAM COPIES, THEN I DECLINED THEIR VERY GOOD OFFER THEY GAVE ME, AND I ALSO DID NOT WANT TO CONTINUE GOING TO THE MI5 OFFICE TO WORK, THEY MOST LIKELY THEN BECAME PARANOID AND THEN MONITORED MY EVERY MOVE, JUST LIKE IN LONDON IN 2005 - 2009, THEREBY THEN MAKING ME PARANOID AS WELL, WITH THEIR HARASSMENT AND TERRORIZING ME.

IN MY BOOK I EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT DH THEREAFTER AND HOW HE THEN GOT THE OTHER BRITISH ONES IN JCI OFFICE TO INTERFERE AND HARASS ME INCLUDING HIS MATE - BRENDA, WHO WAS STEVE'S SECRETARY AND HOW THEY HAD ALL THEN GANGED UP AGAINST STEVE, THREATENED HIM NAD HIS AMERICAN WIFE WHOM KATRINA, THE ELDERLY HUNGARIAN WOMAN, HAD TOLD ME LOOKED LIKE MYSELF AFTER HE HAD TO LEAVE SA UNEXPECTEDLY, BECAUSE HE REFUSED TO ONLY KEEP ME ON FOR THE TWO WEEKS THAT THE LAZY AND VERY ARROGANT PORTUGUESE FEMALE WAS ON LEAVE FOR [THEY WERE ALSO ON CONTRACT, BUT I WAS NEVER AFFORDED LEAVE PRIVELEGES AT ANY OF THE COMPANIES THAT I HAD CONTRACTED AT AND THEM THEM KEEPING MY POSITION FOR MY RETURN - HENCE MY CHILDREN AND I THEREFORE NEVER HAD ANY LEAVE OR HOLIDAY BREAKS ALL OF THE YEARS, AS THE FOREIGN 'WHITE' ONES ALL HAD.

THESE ARE ALL THE REASONS WHY, WHEN WE WERE TOLD THAT WE SHOULD ALL HAVE A PROTEST AGAINST THE RECEIVER OF REVENUE MAKING THEM PAY TAX, I THOUGHT AND EVEN SHOUTED BACK AT DAVID HEATH, IN +-198? AT THE STURROCK PARK GUILD HALL AND WHEN HE SHOUETD FROM THE STAGE "WE WILL NOT PAY TAX, BECAUSE THIS GOVERNMENT ARE THIVES! - IN THAT CROWDED HALL I SHOUTED, "YOU LIAR, YOU ARE THE THIEF!", BECAUSE I RECALLED HOW HE HAD NOT WANTED ME TO HAVE THAT CONTRACT AT JCI, THEN INTIMIDATED ME THEIR AFTER, BY CALLING ME SARCASTICALLY, "THE CLAUDINE FOURIE" AND HE EVEN TRIED TO WITHOLD MY BONUS THAT JCI GAVE TO ALL CONTRACTORS - BUT ONE OF MY AFRIKANER COLLEAGUES ASKED ME IF I HAD ALSO RECEIVED MINE, AND TOLD ME THAT ALL THE OTHER CONTRACTED HAD - HE WAS PERMANENT STAFF. I SAID THAT I HAD NOT AND THEN I WENT STRAIGHT UP TO FIND THE ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT AND THAT WAS WHEN I FIRST MET...........MODISE, A VERY DECENT YOUNG BLACK MAN WHO WAS STUDYING PART-TIME, HE TOLD ME FOR HIS BCOM.
WE CHECKED UP AND GOT THE EXACT DATE THAT DH WAS PAID IT, I THEN WENT DOWN TO MY DESK AND CALLED DH. I TOLD HIS WIFE ANNE, THAT THEY WERE PAID MY BONUS OVER A MONTH AGO AND THAT I HAD NOT YET RECEIVED FROM THEM AS YET. HE THEN BROUGHT MY CHEQUE THE FOLLOWING DAY AND SAID THAT TO ME ALOUD FOR THE OTHERS TO HEAR. [MORE IN MY BOOK]

I THEN VERY ANGRILY WALKED OUT OF THE HALL, DESPITE THE OTHER GUYS INCLUDING MY AGENTS ALL SEEING NAD HEARING WHAT I HAD SAID, THEN DROVE OFF HOME AND MADE AN APPOINTMENT TO SEE THE THEN DIRECTOR OF RECEIVER OF REVENUE, MR. JOHAN LABUSCHAGNE, WHOM I READ ABOUT IN THE NEWSPAPER A FEW MONTHS AFTER THE PROTEST, HAD DIED IN A MOTOR ACCIDENT IN OFS???. HIS SECRETARY GAVE ME AN APPOINTMENT AND I LODGED MY APPEAL WITH THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE AS WELL IN WRITING STATING THAT I AM NOT PART AND PARCEL OF THIS PROTEST, STATING ALL OF MY REASONS, WHICH WERE IN MY COUNTRY’S INTEREST.

I THEN DECIDED TO EVEN DISCUSS THE MATTER WITH THE THEN DIRECTOR OF MANPOWER, YEARS LATER, BECAUSE HAD BY THEN HAD ENOUGH OF NOT BEING OFFERED LONGER CONTRACTS OR ALTERNATE ONES, THAT IS WHY I HAD DIFFERENT AGENTS AND EVEN HAD TO CALL SASOL UP IN 1991, WHERE I SPOKE TO MR. PAUL KRUGER’S SECRETARY NAD TOLD HER THAT I HAD SHARES [VERY LITTLE, AS I DID NOT GET THE EXPEVTED RATES AND ASSIGNMENT THAT I ENVISIONED, TO PURCHASE MORE AS I HAD DONE SO WITH MY SMALL COMPENSATION I HAD RECEIVED FROM KENT INSTRUMENT'S MOTOR CAR ACCIDENT IN RANDFONTEIN IN 1985, ON OUR RETURN FROM A MINE TENDER MEETING AT RANDFONTEIN ESTATES, WITH ENGINEERS FROM JCI, ETC TOO.
BUT ANYWAY] AND THAT I THEREAFTER RECEIVED A CALL FROM MR SIAS SWART’S ALSO LOVELY SECRETARY, WHO ARRANGED AN APPONTMENT FOR ME – HE THEN TOLD ME AND I SAW THAT THERE WAS NO SPACE IN THAT ENGINEERING AND SALES ONLY DEPARTMENT AT THE HEAD OFFICE, BUT IN A CIVILIZED AN DECENT AND TRULY CHRISTIAN AND HUMANE WAY, HE THEN DREW UP THE MOST PROFESSIONAL WORK CONTRACT THAT [MY FINGERS OHDEAR] I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE OF ALL MY CONTRACTS, AND I STILL HAVE IT TO THIS DAY, I THINK – AND HE GAVE ME THE BEST RATE I HAD EVER BEEN GIVEN AS WELL.

I NEEDED TO PAY MY BOND AND MY CAR PAYMENTS AND THIS ASSISTED ME SO MUCH, BECAUSE AFTER THE BRITISH AGENTS HAD HEARD THAT I HAD PURCHASED MYSELF A TINY LITTLE HOUSE IN A ‘WHITE’ ONLY AREA, THEY THEN REFUSED TO OFFER ME WORK AGAIN! BUT THE GOOD LORD BLESSES ME AND GUIDES ME, BUT WHY SHOULD I BE SATISFIED WITH THE SCRAPS – OF COURSE I AM MOST THANKFUL, BUT WHEN I LOOK AROUND ME AND EVALUATE AND ANALYZE THE GREAT DISCREPANCIES, ESPECIALLY KNOWING THAT I WAS ALWAYS A HARD WORKER AND NOT LAZY PERSON – I WAS IN FACT A WORKAHOLIC AND I NEVER SMOKED OR DRANK OR TOOK DRUGS IN MY WHOLE LIFE – GOD AND EVERYBODY WHO KNOWS ME, WHOM I HAVE MENTIONED TOO, ALSO KNOW THAT AS A FACT!

THEN AS MY AFRIKAANS COLEAGUES HAD ALSO AGREED WITH ME, ABOUT THE IDEA OF “WAAROM VORM JY NIE JOU EIE UNIE NIE”, I THEN THOUGHT ABOUT IT AND MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE DIRECTOR OF MANPOWER, MR. KNOESEN, THROUGH HIS SECRETARY, BECAUSE THE SECRETARIES ALWAYS ANSWERED THE TELEPHONES AND HE EVEN SUGGESTED TO ME THAT I WOULD NEED TO HAVE A CONSTITUTION DRAWN UP FIRST AND HE EVEN CALLED HIS COLLEAGUES AND INTRODUCED ME TO THEM AND TOLD THEM WHAT I INTENDED TO DO AND THEIR SECRETARIES ALWAYS BROUGHT US TEA AND BISCUITS AS WE TALKED. I DID NOT STAY LONG BECAUSE I HAD MY CHILDREN TO COLLECT FROM SCHOOLS, BUT THESE GENTLEMAN WERE ALWAYS SO WILLING TO LISTEN TO WHAT ONE HAD TO SAY AND EVEN GIVE THEIR OPINIONS AS WELL TO TRY TO ASSIST AND THEY ALSO WONDERED HOW COME I WAS SO CONCERNED AND THIS IS ALL ALSO ABOUT WHY I WENT TO THAT NP MEETING, BECAUSE I I HAD ALSO RECEIVED AN INVITE AS ALL MY NEIGHBOURS HAD TOO, BUT THEY DID NOT ATTEND IT, BECAUSE WE WERE RESIDING IN ALBERTSVILLE [CLAUDINE'SVILLE] THEN, AND I DID SO NOT ONLY FOR MYSELF, BUT FOR ALL THE PEOPLE OF MY COUNTRY, BECAUSE I ALSO KNEW WHAT WAS HAPPENING ON THE MINES THEMSELVES TOO AND HOW THESE BRITISH GUYS SPOKE SARCASTICALLY AND POLITICALLY, UNDERMINING US, OUR ABILITIES AND CAPABILITIES AND TREATING US LIKE REAL IDIOTS AND FOOLS, WHILE THEY ALL DID NOT A STITCH OF WORK IN THE OFFICES, AND THEY SHOWED NO GUILT WHATSOEVER, THIS IS WHY WHEN STEVE FAZEKAS ASKED ME IF I KNEW HOW TO OPERATE A COMPUTER WHEN THERE WAS NOT MUCH DRAWING WORK AND 8 OF US WERE RETRENCHED, BUT HE WAS SO CONCERNED I COULD TELL, ABOUT MY AND MY CHILDREN’S WELFARE, AS WERE THE ONE BRITISH SECTION LEADER, NEIL BELLAMY AND HIS WIFE AND THE BRITISH FEMALE WHO SAT IN FRONT OF JOHNNY, AND BRENDA HAD GONE ON A CONSPIRED STRIKE BY NOT INPUTTING THE DATA OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTORS INTO THE COMPUTER – THEIR HOURS WORKED AND LEAVE, TO BE PAID THEN ARRANGED BY ……..MODISE UPSTAIRS, IN ORDER THAT HE COULD THEN PAY THE AGENTS WHO WOULD THEN IN TURN PAY THE CONTRACTORS.

I WAS ONLY TOO HAPPY AND REPLIED THAT I HAD NEVER, BUT THAT I WAS SURE IT WOULD NOT BE A PROBLEM, IF ONLY I WAS SHOWN A BIT….HE THEN …ITS ALL IN MYBOOK. MY HANDS AND FIGERS NOW SAW , AHVE TO GO TO BUY FOOD ITEMS GOD BLESS. THANK YOU.

GREETINGS TO MY CHILDREN’S FRIENDS, THE DEAR BAKER’S, HUGH, ALLEN AND SISTERS, DRAGAN, DEREK & RUAL GOMEZ etc – DR. ANDREA NOLTE, DR HILLEL FACTOR, VIOLET, TONY WRIGHT, LETTE, ANNA, BOTHA, DONALD AND FAMILY, KENNETH, JOSHRI, RUDI, KURT WILSON AND ALL THE OTHERS WHO WORKED THERE AS WELL – I PRAY FOR ALL OF YOU EVERY NIGHT TOO, NICOLE MYAT AND ALL OF THE OTHERS WHO WORKED WITH US AT WEBBER WENTZEL BOWENS, JOHAN PIENAAR AND ALL THE OTHERS, EXCEPTING HIS EVIL SECRETARY, WHO WORKED WITH ME AT LIBERTY LIFE AND THE ONES AT HEAD OFFICE, ESPECIALLY OF THE MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS AND MR. HUMAN AND ALL AT SCHINDLERS WHEN I WAS THERE AND WHO GAVE ME EVERYTHING FOR MY BABY/IES, ALL WHO WERE MY FRIENDS AT ST. BARNABAS COLLEGE AND AMANDA GARSON WHO ALWAYS BROUGHT ME MESSAGES FROM THEM AND OF COURSE, MY DEAR NEIGHBOURS IN LONDON OF THE EIGHTIES, NAZUK, NAZIMA, RISMA, NAHEEDA, AKTAR AND AFZEL!

OK, ENOUGH ABOUT THAT ONE NOW. BUT I JUST HAD TO SHOW YOU PEOPLE HOW THEY LIED TO ME.

I SEE NOW THAT BRITAIN IN TO GIVE ALL FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN FREE COMPUTERS AND BROADBAND ACCESS. AND WHAT ABOUT OUR SCHOOL CHILDREN AND FAMILIES IN SOUTH AFRICA AND MYSELF TOO AND THE ETHIOPIAN PEOPLE AS WELL. FOR EXAMPLE? ALL THE BENEFITS ARE ALWAYS ONLY FOR BRITAIN ALL OF THE TIME.

SO YOU SEE, I HAVE TO SURVIVE ON THEIR RATIONS AND THEY CAN ONLY ENJOY THE GOOD LIFE AND COMFORTS, THIS IS ‘BRITISH DEMOCRACY’ FOR YOU. THEY CAN ONLY HAVE WHATEVER, EVEN IF THEY HAVE STOLEN IT BY FORCE, BUT WE MUST BE THE BEGGARS – THAT IS BRITISH PSYCHOLOGY.

MY GRANDMOTHER GREW ALMOST EVERYTHING ON HER FARM AND MY FATHER ASSISTED HER WITH HER SWAZI LABOURERS, BUT SHE THEN HAD TO STRUGGLE, AFTER THE BRITISH LAWS DISPOSESSED HER NAD DID NOT COMPENSATE HER AND I ONLY STARTED TO WALK AFTER THE AGE OF TWO, BECAUSE MY OUPA MARRA, SAID THEY SHOULD NOT PUT ME DOWN AND ALWAYS CARRY ME, AS HE DID. I HAD OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL TOYS, ESPECIALLY THE UPHOLSTERY ON MY MINUTURE FURNITURE AND I WAS ALWAYS PLAYING DOLLS’ HOUSE AND INVITING THE NEIGHBOURS [CHILDREN] TO COME AND JOIN ME AT PLAY, BUT PLOUKIE WAS ALWAYS MAKING MY THINGS DISAPPEAR.

A FEW OF US ALSO USED TO VISIT REGINA MUNDI CHURCH IN MEADOWLANDS, WITH FATHER PATRICK MAC CULLAGH AND HE ALSO TOOK US ON OUTINGS TO LITTLE-FALLS, BUT WHEN WE WENT TO DALESIDE FOR A WEEKEND OF PRAYER RETREAT, SOME OF THE BOYS IN OUR YOUTH HAD SMUGGLED LIQUOR IN AND THEY THEREFORE SPOILED OUR TIME ON THE FARM THERE. MY FATHER’S OTHER BROTHERS AND SISTERS WERE ALL ADOPTED BY MY GRANDPARENTS, EXCEPT FOR UNCLE PEDRO, WHO ALSO LIKED ME A LOT TOO, BUT WHEN I CALLED HIM AND MORRIS IN 2004/5 AND TOLD THEM THAT I BELIEVE THAT THEY WERE ALSO INTERFERING WITH MY CLAIMS, THEY BOTH DENIED IT TO ME, THUS LYING AND BOTH PASSED AWAY VERY SOON, HEREAFTER.

I WAS ALSO FORCED BY JUDGE BAM WHOM I HAD FIRST MET WITH HIS WIFE, AT THE SOPHIATOWN CHURCH HAND OVER CELEBRATION, TO TAKE MY CLAIMS TO WITS LEGAL CENTRE [NAD TO THINK THAT I WAS THE VERY STUPID ONE TO ADVERTISE FOR WITS, DURING MY HIGH SCHOOL YEARS, WHEN I DECIDED TO STOP USING MY NORMAL SCHOOL CASE OF WHICH MY GODFATHER, UNCLE BARNETT KAHN HAD GIVEN ME A NEW ONE FOR MY BIRTHDAY EVERY YEAR, AND I WALKED PAST ME STORES ONE DAY, WHEN I SAW THE LARGE KNAPSACKS AND PUCHASED ON FOR MY SCHOOL BAGS. I THEN HAND-PRINTED THAT STUPID AAC BRITISH APARTHEID UNIVERSITY'S NAME ON MY BAG, NOT KNOWING WHAT IT HAD IN FACT BEEN DOING TO US ALL ALONG, AND OF COURSE I HAD HOPED TO ATTEND IT - BUT THANK THE LORD I COULD NOT, BECAUSE I AM BETTER OFF NOT HAVING DONE SO, TO BE HONEST. FRANKLY, RAU, STELLENBOSCH, POTCHEFSTROOM AND UNISA ARE MUCH BETTER OPTIONS!

I ALSO WAS THE FIRST TO PURCHASE A BOATER HAT AND I PUT A GREEN RIBBON AROUND IT, BUT THEN JEHAN MILLER AND OF THE OTHER GUYS IN MY CLASS, FILLED THE INSIDE WITH THEIR SIGNATURES, AND I ALSO TOOK MY FATHERS GREEN BUTTONDOWN SLEEVELESS CARDIGAN, AND THAT WAS MY OFFICIAL SCHOOL UNIFORM.

I HAD ALSO DRAWN POSTER STATING AT WHOSE ADDRESS WE WERE TO HAVE A PARTY THE FOLLOWING WEEKENED AND AFTER TELLING WHOEVER IN THE CLASS, IN STANDARD NINE, THAT WE WERE TO HAVE ONE AT HER HOUSE, I ALSO TOLD ALL WHO SHOULD BRING WHATEVER AND GREGORY PETERS, WHO WAS BLONDE AND BLUE-EYED AND HAD TO TRAVEL WITH GREEN-EYED, GRAHAM MERKEL, etc ALL THE WAY TO PROTEA TO AND FROM OUR CHRIS JAN BOTHA SECONDARY SCHOOL, HE HAD TO CARRY THE CHAIR SO THAT I WAS ABLE TO THEN PASTE MY POSTERS UP OUTSIDE THE ROW OF CLASSROOMS.
THE ONLY TIME I WAS IN TROUBLE WAS WHEN, IN MATRIC, KEITH ..........WHO LIVED DOWN THE ROAD FROM SCHOOL NAD HAD ALWAYS WORN A BLACK TRANSVAAL BLAZER, BUT WITH ONLY HIS RUGBYT BADGE ON IT, HAD PURPOSELY NOT WORN HIS BLAZER TO SCHOOL.

HE HAD THEN ASKED ME TO LOAN HIM MY TRANSVAAL BLAZER, WHICH HAD MY SWIMMING, ATHLETICS, TABLE-TENNIS AND TENNIS TRANSVAAL BADGES THEREON, AND HE THOUGHT THAT MR. MINAAR WOULD NOT NOTICE IT, BUT HE WAS CALLED OUT OF THE LINE BY HIM AND THE TWO OF US WERE MARCHED OFF TO THE HEADMASTER'S OFFICE.

MR. JACOBS ASKED ME WHAT HAD HAPPENED AND I SAID THAT I TRIED TO HELP HIM OUT, AND HE TOLD ME NOT TO DO SO AGAIN, AFTER SMILING AT ME, BUT HE GAVE KEITH SHOTS AND SENT HIM HOME TO FETCH HIS BLAZER. OH, I ALSO USED TO ENJOY PINCHING OF THE TEACHERS SANDWICHES, WHEN THEY WERE CALLED TO THE HEADMASTER'S OFFICE AND I EVEN OFFERED OF IT TO THE OTHERS - THIS IS BAD, NOW THAT I THINK ABOUT IT!
HIS WAS MY TYPE OF NAUGHTINESS.

BUT DURING THE BREAK TIMES, I WAS NEVER ALONE, BECAUSE I WAS ALWAYS BEING JOINED BY [ WAIT HERE THE HELICOPTERS COME AGAIN HOLD ON WHILE I CLOSE] OTHERS FROM CLASSES YOUNGER THAN MINE, TOO.

I HAVE NEVER SEEN SUCH ABUSIVE, VULGAR CHILDREN AS IN THE UK, FROM THE AGE OF 2 UPWARDS TO 50’s, THIS TIME AROUND AND THEIR PARENTS DO NOT EVEN TELL THEM OFF, BUT ARE THE VERY SAME.
IT IS REALLY SHOCKING AND CAN YOU IMAGINE WHAT THEY ARE TO ALSO TURN OUT TO BECOME. BRITAIN SEEMS TO GO FROM ONE EXTREME TO THE OTHER. IN OUR DAYS, THEIR LAWS STATED THAT PARENTS AND SCHOOLS COULD HALF MURDER US, BUT NOW THEY HAVE NO SAY IN DISCIPLINING THEM WHATSOEVER.

WITH VERY PAINFUL FINGERS, I HAVE TO CONTINUE.

IN 1989, I ACTED IN A CIVILIZED MANNER BY GETTING A COURT ORDER AGAINST A FELLOW YOUNG BRITISH DRAUGHTSMAN, ADAM……..WHOM I LIKED, AT GROUP 5 PROJECTS – BOKSBURG, UNTIL HE HAD SHOT ELASTIC BANDS AT MY TINY STRUCTURE/HOUSE I HAD JUST BUILT ON MY DESK, AND HE DESTROYED IT.

I HAD NOW HAD ENOUGH OF HIS CHILDISHNESS BY THEN AS HE HAD ALSO FOR TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO THE 1989 ELECTIONS, HARASSED ME, BY STICK DP STICKERS ONTO MY DRAWING BOARD, TO CO-ERCE ME TO VOTE DP AND I FOUND IT VERY ANNOYING INDEED. I THEREFORE AUTOMATICALLY LOOKED AROUND AND SAID “YOU HAVE BROKEN Y HOUSE”, BUT HE WAS RED WITH LAUGHTER. I THEN TOOK MY ONE SHOE OFF AND THREW IT AT HIM, BUT HE THEN THREW IT OUT OF THE WINDOW AND REFUSED TO FETCH IT WHEN I TOLD HIM TO DO SO. I EVEN FELT LIKE JUDO-ING & KARATE-ING HIM [WHICH I NOW CANNOT DO WITH THIS FIBROMYALGIA AND OTHER ARTHRITIS], BUT BECAUSE WE WERE IN THE OFFICE, I HAD TO CONTROL MY EMOTIONS, BUT I FELT VERY HURT AND I CRIED WHEN IT WAS TIME TO LEAVE THE OFFICE AND I HAD TO THEN GO AND VOTE WITH ONE SHOE OFF AND DRIVE ALL THE WAY TO THE POLLING STATION, THEN COLLECT MY CHILDREN FROM SCHOOL-AFTERCARE, THEN HOME. I EVEN TOLD THE WOMAN AT THE POLLING STATION WHAT HAD HAPPENED CRYING, AND I SAID THAT I WOULD HAVE TO SORT HIM OUT THE FOLLOWING DAY, WHICH I MOST CERTAINLY DID, AFTER I HAD DROPPED MY CHILDREN OFF AT SCHOOL, I THEN DROVE STRAIGHT TO THE BOKSBURG MAGISTARTE’S COURT – I DO NOT KNOW HOW I ALWAYS FOUND THE PLACES AND ITEMS I AM SEARCHING FOR, RUSHED INSIDE AND IN AFRIKAANS AGAIN TOO, TOLD THEM WHAT AD HAPPENED TO ME AND WHAT I WANTED THEM TO DO IS TO GO AND TELL HIM IF HE INTERFERES WITH ME ONCE MORE THEN HE WOULD HAVE TO APPEAR IN COURT. THEY ACTED SO FAST FOR ME, THAT BEFORE THE END OF THAT VERY DAY, AND I HAD NEVER RECEIVED MY WHITE FLAT WOVEN SHOE BACK, BUT I WAS THEN TOLD THAT I WAS DISMISSED “BECAUSE THE COMPANY DID NOT LIKE MY HAVING GONE TO THE COURT”, YET THE MANAGER’S WERE NOT ABLE TO RETRIEVE MY SHOE FROM HIM, WHEN I HAD ALSO TOLD THEM TO DO SO.

HERE I DID ELECTRICAL AND P&ID’s & FLOW DIAGRAMS & COMPUTER WORK FOR THE MOSSGAS, VENETIA AND FINSCH MINING PROJECTS AND THE FOREIGNERS WERE ALL PROTECTED BY THE TOP MANAGMENT NAD DIRECTORS, WHICH WERE “AAC”.

[MORE ABOUT IT IN MY BOOK, BUT I WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE I PUT HIM UNDER PEACE, AND NOT HIM - THAT IS THE BRITISH COMPANY'S FORM OF JUSTICE]

=============================================

BENDOR ……….
“WHILE BENDOR WAS STILL SERVING IN SOUTH AFRICA, WYNDHAM WAS APPOINTED TO SUCCEED AJ BALFOUR AS CHIEF SECRETARY OF IRELAND…

THE MOST VOCIFEROUS APPONENT TO THE MARRIAGE WAS BENDOR’S AUNT, LADY ORMONDE, WHO HAD MARRIED THE FIERRY IRISH MARQUESS, AN EXPERT YACHTSMAN, IN 1876. THE FAMILY SEAT WAS KILKENNY CASTLE, BUT SHE ALSO HAD A ‘GRACE-AND-FAVOUR’ DWELLING NEXT TO GROSVENOR HOUSE. SHE FELT AN OBLIGATION TO PROTECT HER NEPHEW AGAINST THE DESIGNING CORNWALLISS-WEST FAMILY, AND PRINCESS DAISY ALWAYS CLAIMED THAT SHE HAD DONE ALL SHE COULD TO STOP THE WEDDING. [THIS WAS THE ONE TO SHELAGH]…………..

THE GROSVENOR ESTATE – AS LARGE AN ENTERPRISE AS ANY OF A NUMBER OF PUBLIC COMPANIES AND ON THE WHOLE, EXTREMELY WELL-MANAGED – HAD AS ITS RAISON D’ ETRE THE RUNNING OF BENDOR’S PERSONAL AFFAIRS. WHEN THE 1st DUKE DIED, BECAUSE SO MUCH WAS HELD IN TRUST, HIS WILL WAS PROVED AT LESS THAN £1,000,000, BUT ESTATE DUTY OF £600,000, MORE THAN 90% WHICH WAS ON THE LONDON PROPERTIES……………….

1902 – BENDOR HAD TO RETURN TO SOUTH AFRICA CONVINCED THAT THE FUTURE OF THE EMPIRE LAY IN ITS DOMINIONS. HE HAD NO AMBITION TO BECOME A POLITICAL FIGURE HIMSELF, BUT WAS WELL AWARE THAT HIS POSITION IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS ADDED PRESTIGE TO ANY CAUSE HE BELIEVED IN, AND HE SAW HIMSELF AS A BACK-ROOM MAN, GUIDING AND FINANCING OTHERS. HE HAD BECOME A DISCIPLE OF LORD MILNER, AND OTHERS IN THE SMALL CIRCLE AROUND THEIR LEADER INCLUDED INCLUDED PHILIP KERR (LATER THE MARQUESS OF LOTHIAN AND AMBASSADOR TO WASHINGTON), GEOFFREY ROBINSON, LORD BRAND, AND THE WRITER JOHN BUCHAN 9LATER LORD TWEEDMUIR AND MARRIED TO SUSAN GROSVENOR).

MILNER’S GREAT TALENT WAS IN INSPIRING PASSIONATE EMOTION, RESERVED THOUGH HE WAS HIMSELF, AND THE GROUP OF LIKE-MINDED MEN HE GATHERED AROUND HIM WERE NOT ALWAYS POLITICIANS, BUT THEY DID, LIKE BENDOR, HAVE INFLUENCE AND MONEY. HE HAD RISEN FROM A HUMBLE BACKGROUND TO BECOME A CIVIL SERVANT IN THE INLAND REVENUE. THE BOER WAR TOOK HIM TO THE PINNACLE OF POWER – MANY CALLED HIM ‘THE SAVIOUR OF SOUTH AFRICA’ – AND HE NOW URGED THE CREATION OF A POWERFUL FEDERAL COMMONWEALTH OF COUNTRIES WHICH WERE OF PREDOMINANTLY, BRITISH ORIGIN, LOOSELY LINKED, UNITED BY A COMMON LANGUAGE AND OWING ALLEGIANCE TO THE CROWN.
HE BELIEVED THAT FREE TRADE WITHIN THE EMPIRE WAS THE ONLY DEFENCE AGAINST COMMERCIAL RIVALRY FROM THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE, AND THAT HIGH TARIFFS WOULD DEFEAT ALL COMPETITORS , MILNER BEGAN PLANNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A ‘NEW COMMONWEALTH’ IN THE LAND SO RECENTLY LIBERATED BY HIS SOLDIERS. WHEN, DURING BENDOR’S HONEYMOON, THERE WAS A LIBERAL ATTACK ON HIS HERO, HE WAS PROVOKED INTO WRITING A LETTER TO THE TIMES ON 24 FEBRUARY 1901, IN MILNER’S DEFENCE. …….

BENDOR HAD BEEN WORRIED ABOUT SHELAGH’S HEALTH AND TOOK HER TO SOUTH AFRICA FOR OCTOBER. ENCOURAGED BY LEO AMERY AND LORD MILNER, HE HAD BOUGHT 30,000 ACRES OF PASTORAL AND ARABLE LAND CLOSE TO THE BASUTO FRONTIER [I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THESE TITLE DEEDS, BECAUSE THIS LAND IS ALSO PART OF MY GRIQUALND WEST REGION WHICH BRITAIN HAD FORCIBLY STOLEN IN 1800's FOR THE CROWN AND SETTLED BRITISH ONES THEREON, THEN RHODES WAS ALSO GIVEN OF IT, ETC]

HE PLANNED TO LET IT IN 300 ACRE LOTS [NOW COPYING MY GREATGREATGRANDFATHER FROM MY OTHER SIDE, ONLY HE DID NOT ASK THE OTHER AFRIKANERS & GRIQUA & KORANNA PEOPLES]
TO FARMERS EMIGRATING FROM ENGLAND. THE NEAREST TOWN WAS BLOEMFONTEIN, AND HE NAMED HIS ORANGE RIVER ESTATE, WESTMINSTER. BENDOR SAW HIS PURCHASE AS THE FIRST STEP IN A LONG-TERM PLAN OF COLONIZATION, WHICH WOULD EVENTUALLY REBALANCE THE POPULANCE AND REDUCE THE BOERS TO A MINORITY. THE GROWTH OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE WAS THE CAUSE CLOSEST TO HIS HEART AND, INSPIRED BY HIS NEW SCHEME [NOU VLIEG DIE ARMY SPITFIRES OOR MY], HE TOLD HIS FRIEND JOE LAYCOCK THAT HERE AT LEAST WAS ONE MAN BEATING HIS SWORD INTO A PLOUGHSHARE.

SOUTH AFRICA WAS AS BEAUTIFUL AS HE REMEMBERED, AND HE COMMISSIONED SIR HERBERT BAKER TO DESIGN HIM A MEDIUM-SIZED DITCH COLONIAL-STYLE MANOR HOUSE WITH CROW-STEPPED GABLES, WHITE WALLS AND HIGH COOL ROOMS. IT WAS CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS SHIPPED FROM FRANCE, AND WAS SURROUNDED BY COLOURFUL GARDENS. FOR A WHILE, HE VISITED THE COUNTRY EVERY YEAR, AND HE OFTEN SENT OUT FRIENDS AND EMPLOYEES WHOM HE THOUGHT NEEDED A HOLIDAY. THE FIRST SETTLERS WERE EIGHTEEN FAMILIES FROM THE EATON ESTATE, AND A STUD WAS ESTABLISHED WITH SIX THOROUGHBRED STALIONS. [AND IT SO STRANGE, BUT IN 1981, WHEN I WAS WORKING AT PPC - PRETORIA PORTLAND CENEMT IN BRAAMFONTEIN, ALSO AN AAC COMPANY - I WALKED IN MY CALF-LENGTH BEAUTIFUL LILAC WINTER LONG-SLEEVED DRESS AND GREY HIGH HEELS TO THE POST-OFFICE, WHEN I WAS APPROACHED BY A WELL-BUILT GOOD-LOOKING MAN, WHO ASKED ME VERY POLITELY, IF I DID NOT WANT TO GO WITH HIM TO 'JIMMY'S BAR', AND POINTED IT OUT TO ME - THIS WAS WHERE MY EX-HUSBAND AND ALL OF THE OTHER BRITISH GUYS WENT TO EVERY LUNCH-TIME, BUT I REFUSED AND SAID THAT I DO NOT GO TO BARS AND WAS ON MY WAY BACK TO THE OFFICE. HE THEN SAID THAT HE OWNED A HUGE STUD FARM IN THE ORANGE FREE STATE, WHERE HE BREEDS THOROUGHBRED HORSES AND THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE ME THERE TO SEE IT AND HE GAVE ME HIS TELEPHONE NUMBER, BUT I WAS SO SHOCKED AND SCARED SIMULTANEOUSLY AND I NEVER CALLED HIM. BUT I ALWAYS THINK ABOUT IT ANYWAY NAD WONDER WHO HE REALLY WAS - MOST LIKELY ALSO A RELATIVE?, BUT I FELT HE FANCIED ME.]…………………………….

[SORRY I AM TIRED NOW NADHANDS ANDFINGERS NEED TO REST]

THEY SIMPLY HATE IT THAT THE TRUTH ABOUT THEMSELVES BE HEARD AND SEEN, YET THEY HARASS AND TERRORIZE & MAIME & KILL US CONTINUOUSLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY!

THE TRUTH HURTS THE BEASTS ANS SATANISTS, THAT IS THE BOTTEM LINE!

+++++++++++++

EXTRACTS FROM THE BOOK “BENDOR”, BY LESLIE FIELD:

” IF 1898 HAD BEEN ONE LONG PLEASURABLE HOLIDAY FOR BENDOR, EVERYTHING CHANGED IN EBRUARY OF THE NEXT YEAR, WHEN HE PASSED THE ARMY ENTRANCE EXAMINATION WITH CREDIT, AND WAS COMMISSIONED A 2nd LIEUTENANT IN THE ROYAL HORSE GUARDS (THE BLUES). ALMOST IMMEDIATELY, HE SAILED FOR SOUTH AFRICA IN THE UNION CASTLE LINER, ‘NORMAN’, ON HIS APPOINTMENT AS ADC TO SIR ALFRED MILNER, GOVERNMOR AND COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, CAPE OF GOOD HOPE. IN MAY BENDOR WAS PRESENT AT THE BLOEMFONTEIN CONFERENCE BETWEEN SIR ALFRED AND MR. KRUGER, THE BOER LEADER. MILNER HAD A GREAT ADMIRER IN BENDOR, WHO THOUGHT THE BOER CHIEF WAS BLUFFING, AND APPLAUDED THE TOUGH LINE HIS COMMANDER WAS TAKING……..

THE BOER WAR BEGAN ON 11 OCT AND WYNDHAM WAS APPOINTED UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE FRO WAR, A JOB WELL SUITED TO HIS ROMANTIC CONCEPT OF BRITAIN’S IMPERIAL MISSION. WITH THE START OF HOSTILITIES,BENDOR BCAME EXTRA ADC TO LORD ROBERTS, COMM-IN-CHIEF, SOUTH AFRICAN FORCES, WHO ALREADY HAD THE DUKES OF MARLBOROUGH AND NORFOLK ON HIS STAFF. BUT THREE SUCH BLUE-BLOODED SOLDIERS FIGHTING TOGETHER DREW SO MUCH DERISIVE COMMENT THAT THE OTHER TWO WERE REASSIGNED, WITH MARLBOROUGH JOINING HIS COUSIN WINSTON CHURCHILL ON THE MARCH TO JOHANNESBURG……..

WHEN BENDOR WAS TRANSFERRED TO LORD ROBERT’S STAFF HE JOINED HIM AT THE FRONT, WHERE THERE WAS A NUMBER OF HIS RELATIONS. ARTY, GERRY AND BERTIE GROSVENOR WERE ALL IN UNIFORM, AS WERE LORD CHSHAM, LORD CHARLES CAVENDISH AND PRINCE DOLLY OF TECK. BENDOR WAS AT LORD ROBERT’S SIDE WHEN THE GENERAL RELIEVED KIMBERLEY, CAPTURED CRONJE AND TOOK OVER BLEOMFONTEIN. DURING ONE BATTLE, HE CROUCHED FOR COVER WITH HIS TROOPS BEHIND ROCKS ON TOP OF A SUN-BLISTERED HILL, AS THEY FACED A BOER-COMMANDO DETACHMENT. AT ONE STAGE BENDOR SAW ANOTHER OFFICER, FIRING AWAY, CRAWL UP BESIDE HIM. IT WAS MARLBOROUGH WHO JOKED, ‘DUKES ARE CHEAP TODAY’.

THE GREATEST BATTLE WAS THE CAPTURE OF PRETORIA, THE BOER CAPITAL. MR. WH KNOWLES OF GREAT HARWOOD HAD SENT A SMALL PACKAGE ADDRESSED, ‘TO THE OFFICER WHO HOISTS THE UNION JACK (WHEN THAT HAPPY EVENT TAKES PLACE), PRETORIA, SOUTH AFRICA.’
INSIDE WAS A NOTE,
‘THANKS, HAVE A CIGAR’ NAD WHEN THIS WAS DELIVERED TO LORD ROBERTS, HE PASSED IT ON TO HIS ADC [MY WRISTS FINGERS ETC SO PAINFUL, BUT MUST DO IT]. ON 7 JUNE A LETTER WAS SENT FROM GOV. HOUSE, PRETORIA TO MR, KNOWLS.

DEAR SIR,

I WRITE TO SAY THAT I WAS THE OFFICER WHO HOISTED THE UNION JACK OVER PRETORIA, IN CONSEQUENCE OF WHICH I HAVE RECEIVED AN EXCELLENT CIGAR WHICH LORD ROBERTS GAVE M, HAVING BEEN FORWARDED BY YOU. I THANK YOU AGAIN BOTH FOR THE CIGAR AND CONGRATULATIONS AND REMAIN,

YOURS TRULY,
WESTMINSTER
(ADC HQ STAFF)
…………………………

DURING THIS TIME HE ALSO BECAME FRIENDS WITH A MAN WHO WAS TO REMAIN CLOSE TO HIM FOR THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS. HE AND WINSTON CHURCHILL WERE COMPANIONS IN AN ADVENTURE THAT WAS LATER TO FIGURE IN CHURCHILL’S BOOK ON THE BOER WAR, AND THE INCIDENT LED TO BENDOR BEING MENTIONED IN DSPATCHES AND RECEIVING THE QUEEN’S MEDAL, FICE CLASPS.

IN JUNE BENDOR WAS SENT SOUTH FROM PRETORIA TO CAPE TOWN WITH LORD ROBERT’S MAIL……CHURCHILL WHO WAS ASOUTH AFRICAN JOURNALIST, WAS PLEASED TA AN INVITATION TO ACCOMPANY HI,……

BY TH ENED OF OCTOBER THE BRITISH WERE FIRMLY IN CONTROL (ALTHOUGH THE FIGHTING WOULD NOT END UNTIL 1902) AND LORD ROBERTS RETURNED TO LONDON. BENDOR DECIDED TO RESIGN AT THE SAME TIME, AND AFTER HE HAD BEEN DETACHED FROM ARMY DUTIES, HE AND CHURCHILL SPENT A FINAL DAY IN CAPE TOWN FOX-HUNTING WITH SIR ALFRED MILNER, THE BRITISH HIGH COMMISSIONER.

THE TWENTY TO MONTHS SPENT AWAY FROM ENGLAND, HAVING TO SHOULDER RESPONSIBILITY, AND WHERE HIS RANK AND FORTUNE OFFERED NO EXCUSE IF HE FAILED , TURNED BENDOR FROM A BOY INTO A MAN. HE HAD SEEN DEATH, DESTRUCTION, INEFFICIENCY AND THE WASTE OF HUMAN LIVES IN BATTLE AND IT WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY DIFFICULT INDEED FOR THESE THINGS NOT TO CHANGE HIM. HE HAD SERVED BESIDE YOUNG MEN OF HIS OWN CLASS AND BACKGROUND, BUT HE HAD ALSO GOT TO KNOW PEOPLE HE HAD NOTHING IN COMMON AT ALL IN COMMON WITH, AND OF WHOSE LIVES HE HAD NO PRACTICAL KNOWLEDGE…………………..[I HAVE TO REST NOW]

The Acquisition of the Estate

For three hundred years the Grosvenor family has owned large estates in what are now some of the most valuable parts of Westminster. These estates were acquired in 1677 through the marriage of Sir Thomas Grosvenor with Mary Davies, the infant daughter and heiress of a scrivener in the City of London. In the process of time Mary Davies’s inheritance was developed for building, and the Grosvenors became the richest urban landlords in the country, the lustre of their name—for long synonymous with wealth and fashion—being gilded by successive advancements in the peerage, culminating in the dukedom of Westminster in 1874. Today the bulk of that inheritance is still, despite the sale of some of the less select parts, enjoyed by her descendants, and is now administered by the Grosvenor Estate Trustees.

The marriage portion which the guardians of the twelve-year-old Mary Davies were able to offer the young Cheshire baronet Sir Thomas Grosvenor in 1677 consisted of some five hundred acres of land, mostly meadow and pasture, a short distance from the western fringes of built-up London. Not all of this was to be available in immediate possession and the income from the land was at that time relatively small, but its potential for future wealth was realized even then. The area with which this volume is particularly concerned was only a part of that vast holding, approximately one hundred acres in extent and sometimes called in early deeds The Hundred Acres, (ref. 1) lying south of Oxford Street and east of Park Lane. With only minor exceptions this part of Mary Davies’s heritage has remained virtually intact to the present day and forms the Grosvenor estate in Mayfair. The history of the ownership of this land before it came into the possession of the Grosvenor family is, however, best told as part of the history of the larger holding which the third baronet acquired on his marriage. To a considerable extent this story, and that of the personalities involved in it, have been recounted in the two volumes by Charles Gatty entitled Mary Davies and the Manor of Ebury and only a brief outline will be attempted here.

The Manor of Ebury

Most of the London estates which now belong or have belonged to the Grosvenor family—and all of that with which this volume is concerned- once formed part of the manor called Eia in the Domesday survey but later known as Eye, from which Eybury or Ebury derives. Although the manor’s original bounds have not been determined with certainty it probably occupied the territory between the Roman road along the present course of Bayswater Road and Oxford Street on the north, the Thames on the south, the Westbourne river on the west, and the Tyburn, which was also known as Eye or Ay(e) Brook, on the east. (ref. 2) Even these relatively straight forward bounds are difficult to define because these tributaries tended both to change course and to have more than one outlet to the Thames. In the case of the Tyburn the westernmost of several channels, perhaps originally little more than a drainage ditch, seems to have formed the eastern boundary of the manor in its southern part.

After the Norman Conquest Geoffrey de Mandeville obtained possession of the manor, one of many which he took in reward for his services in the Conqueror’s cause. Before the end of William’s reign de Mandeville had given the manor to the Abbey of Westminster and it remained in the Abbey’s ownership until 1536 when it was acquired by Henry VIII. (ref. 3) During this long period two areas came to be distinguished from the main manor, but although sometimes termed manors it is doubtful whether they had entirely separate jurisdictions. (ref. 4) The areas were Hyde in the north-west corner, now incorporated into Hyde Park, and Neyte or Neat(e) in the heart of the district later known as Pimlico. The so-called manor or bailiwick of Neat presents particular problems. In seventeenth- and eighteenth-century title deeds the estate belonging to the Grosvenors is described as the site of the manor of Ebury and parcel of the bailiwick of Neat, (ref. 5) but the use of these terms appears merely to have followed that in early leases in which they were probably employed loosely to describe farms. In fact the Neyte was formerly a manor house or grange of the Abbots of Westminster situated between the modern Warwick Way and Sutherland Row, (ref. 6) and its site, together with some thirty-six acres to the south and east, were not included in Mary Davies’s inheritance, having been granted away separately by the Crown after 1536, and thus did not pass into the ownership of the Grosvenor family.

Surrounded by other lands belonging to Westminster Abbey the manor had lost its identity as a unit of landholding before the end of the Middle Ages, and the process of disintegration continued after its acquisition by the Crown. The many documents and maps which survive show that the subsequent history of its descent is extremely complex, but as few of these complexities affect the history of The Hundred Acres in Mayfair no attempt will be made here to unravel all of them. The ‘Manor of Hyde’ was enclosed into Hyde Park by Henry VIII, and he or his successors also added some land on the east to his new park, for fifteen acres called Tyburn Close and forty acres near Stonehill (apparently the north-eastern and south-eastern extremities of the park) were specifically excluded from subsequent leases and grants of Ebury manor. Other stated exceptions in such transactions were the lands around the ‘Manor of Neate’. (ref. 7)

Although not specified other lands which appear originally to have been within the manor became detached when it was in the hands of the Crown, including a substantial part of Mayfair south of The Hundred Acres. Among these was a large close or series of fields called Brick Close which was later to form part of the Berkeley estate, (ref. and other fields which were incorporated into the manor or bailiwick of St. James. Some six or seven acres to the north of the modern Brick Street were, however, retained; they were included in a schedule of property to be sold to pay the debts of Alexander Davies, Mary Davies’s father, by Act of Parliament in 1675, (ref. 9) and therefore did not pass to the Grosvenors.

Of the areas in Mayfair which apparently became separated from the manor, that which presents the most puzzling aspects is a plot with a frontage to Park Lane, about three acres in extent, immediately to the south of the Grosvenor estate, now occupied by the Dorchester Hotel and parts of Deanery and Tilney Streets. When first leased for building in the 1730’s this was described as waste ground belonging to the manor of Knightsbridge in the ownership of the Dean and Chapter of Westminster. (ref. 10) The Dean and Chapter had acquired the manor (the full title of which was the manor of Knightsbridge with Westbourne Green) from Henry VIII in 1542 (ref. 11) although it had belonged to Westminster Abbey in the Middle Ages. How that manor came to include a parcel of waste ground in the middle of the manor of Ebury is unclear. In Grosvenor estate documents of the eighteenth century the area is defined as ‘a common or waste … called Ossulton Common’. (ref. 12) The name Osolstone is also used to describe this spot in a deed of 1614 and in the same document Park Lane is described as ‘the highwaye from Osolstone to Tiburne’. (ref. 13) The name is also marked on an early manuscript map among the Grosvenor archives which relates to this deed. In the records of Westminster Abbey there are references to a farm ‘at Osolueston’ which belonged to the manor of Eye, and other references to Ossulston, always as part of this same manor. (ref. 14) The evaluation of this evidence in determining the location of the assemblies or courts of the Hundred of Ossulston, the ancient area of jurisdiction which included London, is not within the scope of this volume, and the apparent conflict of evidence about the manorial history of this small area remains unresolved.

Most of the remainder of Ebury manor was let by the Crown in two leasehold entities, the fields of one intermingling with those of the other. Reversionary leases were also granted, apparently as a way of rewarding faithful service, well before the current leases expired, and to complicate matters further each reversionary lease came to be held by more than one person so that partitions of the land had to take place when the previous leases fell in early in the seventeenth century. (ref. 15)

In 1618 a moiety of one lease was bought for £4,760 by trustees acting for Sir Lionel Cranfield, the ambitious merchant who held several offices of state under James I and was later impeached for corruption. (ref. 16) By this purchase Cranfield became the direct leaseholder of a large part of the manor including The Hundred Acres. He also contemplated purchasing the other moiety, which he estimated would cost about £5,000 or £6,000, but was evidently unable to complete the transaction before his fall, for this leasehold interest remained outstanding until its expiry in 1675. (ref. 17) In 1623, however, James I sold the freehold reversion (fn. a) of the manor to two ‘gentlemen’ of London, John Traylman and Thomas Pearson, for £1,151 15s. By a conveyance dated the day following they in turn disposed of it for the same amount to two representatives of Cranfield, by then Earl of Middlesex and Lord High Treasurer of England. (ref. 19) The price was equivalent to thirty years’ purchase of the nominal Crown rents obtained under leases granted by the Tudors, and by buying the manor in fee farm Cranfield could no doubt claim that he was preserving the King’s rent, low as it was. Not only did the grant convey all of the manor with the exception of those parts already detached from it and a royal mulberry garden (now part of the site of Buckingham Palace and its grounds), but additionally some land elsewhere was included. Particularly important for the later history of the Grosvenor estate were some twenty acres at Millbank on the south side of Horseferry Road, for it was here that the first speculative building on the estate took place.

In 1626, when his personal and financial fortunes were at a low point, Cranfield sold his interests in the manor and the additional lands for £9,400 to Hugh Audley (also spelt Awdley or Awdeley), a clerk of the Court of Wards and Liveries who amassed a considerable fortune by lending money. (ref. 20) Although Cranfield had thus made a handsome profit on the two sums he had laid out, he felt that Audley had driven a hard bargain. (ref. 21) Audley held the property until his death at an advanced age in 1662. During this long period he sold some small parcels of land and bought others which had probably once belonged to the manor, (ref. 22) but when he died the estate he had purchased in 1626 was still virtually intact. By a settlement made shortly before his death he left the bulk of the land to his great-nephew Alexander Davies and the detached part at Millbank (known as Market Meadows) to the latter’s brother Thomas Davies, later Sir Thomas Davies, who was Lord Mayor of London in 1676–7. (ref. 23) After Audley’s death Thomas Davies sold his holding for £2,000 to his brother (ref. 24) so that Alexander Davies possessed all of Audley’s former estate in the area.

Abridged pedigree of Audley, Davies and Grosvenor families

Alexander Davies was a scrivener by profession and had worked for Audley. (ref. 25) Although scriveners were technically the draftsmen of deeds they also undertook many of the functions later associated with lawyers, particularly the management of investments for clients, and Davies probably had access to ready supplies of capital. He decided to embark on speculative building on his new property and as the site chose Market Meadows at Millbank, which he had purchased from his brother. He let the land along the river front for building, reserving a large plot at the southern end as the site of a mansion for his own occupation. This was later called Peterborough House and then Grosvenor House when it became the principal London residence of the Grosvenor family in the first half of the eighteenth century. In 1665, however, ‘in the time of the … greate Sicknesse’ Alexander Davies died at the age of twenty-nine, leaving the speculation unfinished, his mansion half built, and an infant daughter less than six months old as his heir. (ref. 26) This was the Mary Davies who was to marry Sir Thomas Grosvenor in 1677.

Alexander Davies had settled the estate on trustees for the benefit of his heirs with provision for an annuity of £100 to be paid to his widow. (ref. 27) The settlement did not extinguish her right of dower, however, and so his widow, also named Mary, could claim a life interest in a third of the property. She quickly remarried, her second husband being John Tregonwell, a Dorset squire, and was hereafter, of course, known as Mrs. Tregonwell. Despite the potential wealth of the estate the immediate problem facing the Tregonwells was the settlement of Alexander Davies’s debts. He had not paid the £2,000 purchase money for the land at Millbank and had borrowed heavily to finance his building programme. Nearly £2,000 more had to be spent on the unfinished mansion to make it habitable and there were annuities and interest charges on the estate. A substantial part of the land yielded no income as it was still subject to the leasehold interest granted by the Crown (previously referred to) which was not due to fall in until 1675. John Tregonwell later claimed to have advanced a considerable amount of his own money in settling Alexander Davies’s affairs, (ref. 28) and in 1675 an Act of Parliament was passed enabling some property to be sold to pay the debts. (ref. 9) Specified in the Act were Goring House (on the site of Buckingham Palace) and some twenty acres adjoining, five acres which now lie in the north-western corner of Green Park, the seven acres in Mayfair to the north of the line of Brick Street referred to above, and twenty-two acres in Knightsbridge. The land in Knightsbridge was repurchased by the Grosvenor family in 1763. (ref. 29) The Act also provided that several fields in the Mayfair portion of the estate should be held in dower by Mrs. Tregonwell. About fifty-six acres were involved, constituting the western part of The Hundred Acres. This had some effect on the building history of the area as the dower lands were exempted from subsequent settlements and were held under a different tenure when building leases came to be granted.

Despite these temporary difficulties, however, there was no doubt about the eligibility of the infant Mary Davies as a future wife for some aspiring young nobleman. In 1672 an agreement was drawn up whereby she was to be married to the Hon. Charles Berkeley, the eldest son of John, first Baron Berkeley of Stratton, as soon as she reached her twelfth birthday, when she would be of age to consent to the match. As part of the contract Lord Berkeley paid £5,000 immediately to John Tregonwell, partly in recompense for money spent in finishing Alexander Davies’s mansion and in the upbringing of Mary; he also agreed to settle land of a considerable annual value either on, or in trust for, the couple by the time of the ceremony. (ref. 30) The marriage, however, never took place. According to an account preserved in the Grosvenor archives and probably drawn up by Mrs. Tregonwell (ref. 31) the reason was that Lord Berkeley was unable to provide the land. Although he was a rich man he had recently built an expensive mansion, Berkeley House in Piccadilly, and at about this time he purchased Brick Close in Mayfair, immediately to the south of the fields belonging to Mary Davies. (ref. 32) The breakdown of these plans mattered little for within a few months of her twelfth birthday a husband had been found for her in the twenty-oneyear-old baronet, Sir Thomas Grosvenor.

The Grosvenor Marriage

The marriage between Mary Davies and Sir Thomas Grosvenor took place on 10 October 1677 in the church of St. Clement Danes, where the bride’s grandfather, Dr. Richard Dukeson, was rector. (ref. 33) The Grosvenors were an ancient Cheshire family claiming a somewhat tenuous descent from Hugh Lupus, first Earl of Chester, one of William the Conqueror’s foremost knights and possibly his nephew. By the seventeenth century they owned land in Chester, Cheshire, Denbighshire and Flintshire and also valuable lead mines in the last two counties. In 1622 Sir Richard Grosvenor was created a baronet by James I, and Sir Thomas, his great-grandson, was the third baronet. The family seat was at Eaton Hall, near Chester.

All Sir Thomas Grosvenor’s prospects from the marriage were in the future. In deference to her tender years his bride remained for at least two years in the care of a guardian aunt, and as part of the marriage bargain he had to expend a considerable sum of money. Lord Berkeley’s £5,000 had to be repaid with interest, and among other sums required to be disbursed John Tregonwell received £1,000 for a reversionary interest in the estate which would arise in the event of the death of Mary Davies before reaching the age of twenty-one, and which he had prudently acquired by assignment. (ref. 34) While a settlement of the estates in Cheshire and North Wales for the benefit of any male heirs of the marriage in order of primogeniture was made shortly after the ceremony, (ref. 35) a similar settlement of that part of Mary Davies’s lands which was free from dower had to await her twenty-first birthday and was finally made in 1694. (ref. 36) The total annual rental value of the London estates in 1677 was £2,170, but one third of this was payable to Mrs. Tregonwell in dower, and after annuities and other payments the clear income from the rest amounted to £824. (ref. 37) Besides this income, some £3,400 were obtained in 1681 when thirtyfive acres were sold, apparently by royal wish, to the Earl of Arlington. (ref. 38) The land involved now constitutes parts of the grounds of Buckingham Palace, Green Park and Hyde Park Corner. A further two and a half acres in Chelsea, now or formerly part of the grounds of the Royal Hospital, were also sold. (ref. 39)

Sir Thomas Grosvenor died in 1700 leaving three sons under the age of twelve; a daughter also was born a month after his death. All three sons eventually succeeded to the baronetey. Sir Richard, the eldest, died in 1732. His brother, Thomas, succeeded him for only seven months before his death in Naples early in 1733. The youngest son, Robert, then became the sixth baronet until his death in 1755; he was the only one of the three brothers to leave any issue.

The effect of the settlement of 1694 was that on her husband’s death Dame Mary Grosvenor, as Mary Davies was now styled, was left a life interest in the London estate, with the exception of those parts held in dower by her mother. She had already shown signs of mental instability during her husband’s lifetime and her illness was no doubt accelerated by his death. In 1701 while in Paris she married, or was inveigled into a bogus marriage by, Edward Fenwick, the brother of a Roman Catholic chaplain she had taken into her household. Four years of legal disputes ensued until the supposed marriage was annulled by the Court of Delegates in 1705. (ref. 40) In the same year a commission of lunacy was appointed to enquire into her mental state. She was adjudged insane and committed to the care of Francis Cholmondeley of Vale Royal in Cheshire, who had been appointed one of the guardians of her children by Sir Thomas Grosvenor’s will. (ref. 41) As a result the revenues from her estate were paid into the Court of Chancery to be invested for her benefit, and any change in the use or disposition of the land could only be made by leave of the Court. Dame Mary lived on without regaining her faculties until 1730.

In 1708 Sir Richard Grosvenor married Jane Wyndham, daughter of Sir Edward Wyndham of Orchard Wyndham in Somerset. In return for a marriage portion of £12,000 he agreed to make a new settlement of the estates in his possession and of those in which his mother had a life interest, in part to secure a jointure for his wife. (ref. 42) In view of his mother’s lunacy, however, it was only possible to do this with the authority of an Act of Parliament which was duly obtained in 1711 when he had reached the age of twenty-one. (ref. 43) The effect of the settlement was to preserve the descent of the estates in the male line, firstly to his male heirs if any and then to his brothers and their male heirs. Jane Grosvenor died in 1719 without issue and Sir Richard married again. His second wife was Diana Warburton, daughter of Sir George Warburton of Arley in Cheshire. This time a dowry of £8,000 was provided and a new settlement was drawn up, but its effect was to preserve the same contingent remainders as earlier ones. (ref. 44) Diana Grosvenor died in 1730, also without issue.

A clause was inserted in the Act of 1711 to enable Sir Richard Grosvenor to grant building leases for any term up to sixty years of the land in London in which his mother held a life interest (but excluding the land held in dower by Mrs. Tregonwell). The Act referred to some old and ruinous buildings which might be rebuilt, but otherwise there is no indication that any specific development was then planned.

In 1717 Mrs. Tregonwell died (ref. 45) and the third of the estate which she had held in dower passed in fee simple to Dame Mary Grosvenor. The income from this land was also henceforth administered on her behalf by the officials of the Court of Chancery.

Footnotes

a In strict terms the manor was sold in fee farm, for a perpetual annual rent of £38 7s. 10d. (equal to the total rent due under the existing leases) was payable to the Crown. In 1663 this rent was granted by Charles II to the Earl of Sandwich (ref. 18) and was thereafter paid to the Earl and his descendants.
References

1. P.R.O., C66 880, m. 32.
2. William Loftie Rutton, ‘The Manor of Eia, or Eye next Westminster’, in Archaeologia, vol. LXII, 1910, pp. 31–58, from which most of the information about the early history of the manor is derived.
3. 28 Henry VIII, c. 49 in Statutes of the Realm, vol. III, 1817, pp. 709–12.
4. Rutton, op. cit., p. 33.
5. E.g. G.O., early deeds and papers, no. 242.
6. Rutton, op. cit., p. 34.
7. G.O., early deeds . . ., no. 11.
8. B. H. Johnson, Berkeley Square to Bond Street, 1952, pp. 10–21.
9. 27 Car. II, c. 2, private.
10. M.L.R. 1738 4 11.
11. Calendar of Letters and Papers of Henry VIII, vol. XVII, p. 392.
12. GBA 75.

MORE OF THE GREAT EXAMPLES OF THIEVES, WHO HAD EVEN HAD MARY DAVIES WHOM THOMAS GROSVENOR HAD MARRIED AT 12yrs OLD AND AFTER HE DIED AND LEFT THE GROSVENOR ESTATES TO HER, THEY & THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENTS, THEN GOT HE DECLARED AS MENTALLY INSANE SO THAT THEY COULD THEM BE IN CONTROL OF THE WEALTH – THIS IS THE ‘GREAT CULTURED, EDUCATED AND CIVILIZED’ NATION, WHO OVERCHARGE FOREIGN AND OTHER BRITISH STUDENTS TO COME AND BE EDUCATED AND BRAIN-WASHED WITH THEIR PRACTICES.

AND WHEN I HAD ASKED THEM “TO GIVE ME THE DETAILS OF WHEN, HE VARIOUS DATES THAT THE GROSVENORS CAME TO SOUTH AFRICA, ESPECIALLY SINCE THE LATE 1800’s ONWARDS, I WAS TOLD THAT THERE WERE “NONE” – [BUT I KNEW THEY WERE LYING, BECAUSE I HAD ALREADY FOUND PROOFS TO THE EFFECT IN SOUTH AFRICA AND MY GRANDMOTHER ALSO TOLD ME SO AND SHE HAD A VAST COLLECTION OF STAMPS FROM ESPECIALLY BRITAIN AND OTHER COUNTRIES TOO -SOSHE MUST ALSO HAVE RECEIVED CORRESPONDENCES FROM OVERSEAS AND SHE ALSO HAD A VAST COLLECTION OF COINS, ALL OF WHICH PLOUKIE HAD THROWN AWAY. MY GRANDMOTHER HAD ALSO HAD A BRAND NEW LAND ROVER DICOVERY IN THE LATE 1950's/60's, WHICH MY FATHER USED TO MOVE HER OUT OF THE COUNTRY TO SWAZILAND AND I ACCOMPANIED HIM ON ALL THOSE TRIPS, AFTER SHE HAD PURCHASED HER FARM IN MANZINI FROM A BRITISH WOMAN - ACCORDING TO MY REASEARCH I FOUND IN 1993, FROM PROFITS SHE HAD MADE ON THE SALE OF HOUSE SHE HAD SOLS PRIVATELY, BEFORE THE BRITISH APARTHEID LAWS TOOK HER OTHER OVER 300 ONES FROM 1958-1961, ACCORDING TO MY RESEARCHES AND HAD NEVER PAID HER, DESPITE THE FACT THAT SHE HAD EVEN HAD BRITISH LAWYERS REPRESENTING HER - I HAD EVEN APPROACHED THEM TOO, IN 1993], – YET I TOO GET TERRORIZED, HARASSED & SURVEILLANCED, BY THE DESPICABLE BRITISH AUTHORITIES & THEIR POLICE & STREET GANGSTERS, BUT THIS IS NOT DONE TO THEIR CRIMINALS WHICH INCLUDES THEMSELVES FROM THE VERY TOP, WHO SANCTION, PLAN, AUTHORIZE & IMPLEMENT ALL OF THESE ATROCITIES AGAINST THE DIV [DECENT, INNOCENT AND VULNERABLE] PEOPLES :

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
[ I DISCOVERED THIS ITEM OF BENDOR'S DAUGHTER ONLY A FEW WEEKS AGO]

“LADY MARY GROSVENOR

PUBLISHED:12:00am BST 21 JUN 2000

SPORTING, MOTOR-RACING, SURPRISING, STRAIGHTFORWARD DAUGHTER OF THE ECCENTRIC DUKE OFWESTMINSTER, ‘BENDOR’.

LADY MARY GROSVENOR, WHO HAS DIED AGED 89, WAS THE YOUNGER DAUGHTER OF THE 2nd DUKE OF WESTMINSTER, KNOWN AS “BENDOR ” AND ONE OF THE RICHEST MEN IN THE WORLD UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 1953.

A LOVER OF OUTDOOR LIFE, LADY MARY RODE, SHOT, STALKED, FISHED, AND SHOWED WELSH PONIES. SHE WAS VERY MUCH AT HOME UNDER SAIL AND OR IN A MOTOR BOAT, AND IN YOUNGER DAYS WAS A KEEN MOTOR RACING AND RALLY DRIVER, NEVER HAPPIER THAN WHEN STRIPPING DOWN THE ENGINE OF A BUGATTI.

SHE DIVIDED HER TIME BETWEEN BRITAIN AND SOUTH AFRICA, WHERE IN THE 1930’s HER FATHER – WHO HAD FOR A TIME BEEN ADC TO LORD MILNER – GAVE HER “WESTMINSTER”, AN ESTATE IN THE ORANGE FREE STATE WHICH HE HAD DEVELOPED FROM VIRGIN VELD. THERE LADY MARY LIVED IN THE HOUSE DESIGNED BY HERBERT BAKER – WHOSE OTHER WORK INCLUDED GROOTE SCHUR IN CAPE TOWN FOR CECIL RHODES – AND HUNTED HER OWN PACK OF HOUNDS.
CAPABLE, RESILIENT AND HIGHLY ORGANISED, LADY MARY LATER ALSO RAN A FARM IN KENYA, ANOTHER FARM (AND A SHOOT) IN SHROPSHIRE, A HOUSE IN CHESHIRE NEAR THE GROSVENOR’S SEAT AT EATON, AND HER FAMILY’S EXTENSIVE HIGHLAND ESTATE AT KYLESTROME, IN SUTHERLAND. SHE STALKED AT KYLESTROME FOR MORE THAN 60 YEARS, KEEPING METICULOUS DIARIES OF HER SPORTING EXPLOITS ON THE HILL.

LADY MARY CONSTANCE GROSVENOR WAS BORN ON JUNE 27 1910. HER FATHER HAD INHERITED THE WESTMINSTER DUKEDOM AND ACLUTCH OF OTHER PEERAGES ON HIS GRANDFATHER’S DEATH IN 1899; HER MOTHER WAS A DAUGHTER OF COLONEL WILLIAM CORNWALLIS-WEST. HER BROTHER, EARL GROSVENOR, A GODSON OF KING EDWARD VII’s, DIED AGED FOUR, AFTER AN OPERATION FOR APPENDICITIS, LADY URSULA, HER ELDER SISTER, WAS BORN IN 1902.

THE FAMILY DECENDS FROM ROBERT LE GROSVENOR, WHO RECEIVED A GRANT OF LAND IN CHESHIRE FROM HUGH OF KEVELIOC, EARL OF CHESTER IN THE 1170’s. A BARONETCY WAS CONFERRED ON RICHARD GROSVENOR, MP FOR CHESHIRE, IN 1622; THE EARLDOM OF GROSVENOR WAS CREATED IN 1784 FOR SIR RICHARD GROSVENOR, 7th Bt, WHOSE SON ROBERT WAS ADVANCED TO MARQUESS OF WESTMINSTER IN 1831. HUGH LUPUS GROSVENOR, ELDEST SURVIVING SON OF THE 2nd MARQUESS, WAS ELEVATED TO DUKE OF WESTMINSTER IN 1874.

THE FAMILY’S ENORMOUS WEALTH STEMS FROM THE MARRIAGE IN 1677 OF SIR THOMAS GROSVENOR, 3rd Bt, TO MARY DAVIS, ONLY DAUGHTER AND HEIRESS OF ALEXANDER DAVIS, OF EBURY, MIDDLESEX. DAVIS OWNED SEVERAL HUNDRED ACRES OF THEN RURAL MAYFAIR AND BELGRAVIA, WHICH WOULD BE DEVELOPED BY THE 1st EARL GROSVENOR ONCE HE WAS EMPOWERED, BY SPECIAL ACT OF PARLIAMENT IN 1826, TO DRAIN WHAT WAS KNOWN AS “FIVE FIELDS” (NOW PIMLICO), THEN POOR SWAMPY LAND, THE HAUNT OF FOOTPADS.

LADY MARY WAS BROUGHT UP BY NURSES AND GOVERNESSES AT EATON HALL, THE VAST NEO-GOTHIC PILE BUILT IN THE 1970’s BY ALFRED WATERHOUSE, STANDING ON THE BANKS OF THE DEE IN CHESHIRE. (MOST OF THE HOUSE WAS DEMOLISHED IN THE EARLY 1960’s, AS BEING TOO EXPENSIVE TO MAINTAIN.)

WITH THE OUTBREAK OF THE GREAT WAR, WHEN LADY MARY WAS FOUR, HER FATHER WENT OFF TO JOIN SIR JOHN FRENCH’S STAFF IN FRANCE, TAKING WITH HIM A ROLLS-ROYCE FITTED WITH A HOTCHKISS MACHINE-GUN. IN 1916, IN EGYPT, HE LED AN ARMOURED-CAR UNIT ACROSS THE DESERT IN A SUCCESSFUL MISSION TO RESCUE SEVERAL DOZEN SURVIVORS OF THE BRITISH WARSHIP TARA. THEY HAD BEEN CAPTURED BY THE SENUSSI AFTER TARA HAD BEEN TORPEDOED IN THE GULF OF SOLLUM.

NOT LONG AFTER THE DUKE RETURNED FROM THE WAR, WHEN LADY ARY WAS 10, HE AND THE DUCHESS DIVORCED; HE WOULD MARRY THREE MORE TIMES. HE ALSO SENSED THAT THE ERA OF LONDON’S GREAT ARISTOCRATIC RESIDENCES HAD ENDED, AND PULLED DOWN THE FAMILY’S 18th-CENTURY MANSION, GROSVENOR HOUSE.

YACHTS WERE A DIFFERENT MATTER AND IN THE TWENTIES AND THIRTIES THE DUKE WOULD TAKE HIS FAMILY AND FRIENDS CRUISING ON HIS STEAM YACHT CUTTY SARK, A CONVERTED MAGNIFICENT FOUR-MASTERED SCHOONER, WHICH HELPED IGNITE HIS DAUGHTER MARY’S INTEREST IN SAILING.

WHEN HER FATHER DIED IN 1953, HE LEFT LADY MARY, AMNG OTHER THINGS, “TWO PEARLS WHICH CAME FROM THE RIVER LAXFORD”. A PAINTING BY THE DUTCH MASTER MEINDERT HOBBEMA AND A LIFE INTEREST, SHARED WITH HER SISTER AND THE DUKE’S WIDOW, IN HIS EXTENSIVE CHATTELS.

BLESSED WITH A COMMANDING PRESENCE AND PLENTY OF COMMON SENSE, LADY MARY HAD NO TIME FOR PRETENSION OR POMPOSITY. ALTHOUGH SHY WITH STRANGERS, SHE COULD BE VERY DIRECT WHEN SHE FELT A SITUATION REQUIRED IT; SHE COULD DELIVER A DEVASTATINGLY WELL-AIMED ROCKET – BUT WOULD ALWAYS THEN OFFER SHAKEN RECIPIENTS A DRINK.

SHE HAD A KEEN SENSE OF HUMOUR. AND IN SPITE OF HER EXTRAORDINARY BACKGROUND SUCCEEDEDD IN LIVING A STRAIGHFORWARD AND HAPPY LIFE.
SHE NEVER MARRIED, BUT WAS HELD IN GREAT AFFECTION BY ALL WHO KNEW HER.”

++++++++++++++

YES, IT IS VERY EASY TO O WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO IN LIFE, IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY TO DO SO!

I USED TO ACCOMPANY MY FATHER ON HUNTING TRIPS WITH OF HIS AFRIKANER UNCLES WHO RESIDED ON THE EAST RAND, IN SOUTH AFRICA UNTIL WE WERE AGAIN FORCED TO MOVE, THIS TIME TO RIVERLEA, WHERE OPPENHEIMERS NAD THEN BRITISH CONTROLLED AND DIRECTED AUTHORITIES HAD ESTABLISHED ONE OF THE MANY NON-’WHITE’ SUBURBS, OR AS THEY CALLED IT “TOWNSHIPS”, NAD FORCIBLY SEPERATED US AND DUMPED US IN THESE TOXIC GOLD AND COAL MINING SECTIONS, FILLED AND SURROUNDED BY THEIR REMNANTS OF THEIR EXTRACTIONS, FOR THEIR OWN INTERESTS OVERSEAS, ESPECIALLY.

WE DID SO BECAUSE WE NEEDED THE MEAT TO EAT, BUT TH EBRITISH WERE NAD STILL ARE HUNTING OUR ANIMALS FOR FUN AND PLEASURE AND BUSINESS [ENRICHMENT] ONLY.
MY BROTHERS AND I EVEN GREW UP WITH A PELLET GUN.

I WANT MR. ZUMA TO RESTORE THE FIREARMS TO THE RESPONSIBLE PREVIOUS OWNERS THEREOF AND ALLOW DIV AND RESPINSIBLE PEOPLE TO BE ALLOWED TO OWN AND USE THEM FOR SELF AND OTHER’S PROTECTION, TO ELIMINATE THIS CRIME PANDEMIC – THIS SHOULD BE DONE IN UK TOO, SOUTH AFRICA AND OTHER COUNTRIES SHOULD STOP FOLLOWING THE EVIL LAWS AND HABITS OF BRITAIN! MY FINGERS, ETC ARE NOW VERY STIFF, COLD AND PAINFUL.

WE ARE ALL KNOWN BY AND FOR OUR DEEDS/ACTIONS.
BECAUSE, ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.

ON MORE – OF THE GREAT BRITISH HISTORY OF “CIVILIZING” OTHERS, EXCEPT THEMSELVES [THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO THE FEW DECENT BRITS WHO AGREE WITH ME AND THOSE WHO ALL KNOW ME, INCLUDING THE ONE'S WHOM THE BRITISH REGIME GANGSTERS AND THE ONES FROM THE VERY TOP TO THE VERY BOTTEM OF SOCIETY - HAVE ALSO MURDERED AND ABUSED]:

Parliamentary Papers, 1901, XLVII
Cd. 608, Cd. 694 (extracts)

I WANT TO SHOW THE PROOFS OF THE REPORT STATISTICS OF THA AMOUNT OF ‘WHITE & COLOURED’ PEOPLE IN THESE C CAMPS, BUT THIS SPACE IS INSUFFICIENT.

ANYWAY, I GOT ANOTHER HEART ATTACK TOO, ON RECEIVING A MESSAGE OVERSEAS, FROM SOUTH AFRICA, IN 2003/4, THAT MY GRANDMOTHER’S HOME IN WHICH I WAS BORN NAD HAD ALSO DISCOVERED WAS STILL IN THE POSSESSION OF THE JOHANNEBSURG CITY COUNCIL [BRITISH - GROUP AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD] IN 1993 -, JUST AS THE 12 VACANT STAND THAT I HAD ASKED FOR IN 1990, IN ALBERTSVILLE [CLAUDINE'SVILLE], WHICH I WERE TOLD WERE NOT AVAILABLE TO MYSELF AS PART OF MY COMPENSATION, I HAD WANTED SINCE THEN ALREADY, BUT WERE HASTILY AUCTIONED OFF TWO WEEKS LATER BY VLEISSENTRAAL IN PRETORIA.

I HAD ONLY BEEN ABLE TO PURCHASE A COMPUTER OF OUR OWN IN LATE 1990’s OR 2000?, AND THE VERY FIRST I SET OUT TO DO WAS WRITE BY BOOK “ALBERTSVILLE – MY STRUGGLE”, UNEDITED, BECAUSE I DESPERATELY NEEDED MONEY FOR US AND SENT COPY ON A DISK TO TAFELBERG PUBLISHERS AND SOME OTHER CT BASED ONE TOO, BUT THEY SAID IT WAS “NT THE RIGHT TIME FOR IT.”

I HAVE ALSO SINCE FIRST HAVING MET POLISH PEOPLE IN 1978, THE FIRST PERSON BEING ANDRE KUCIO, AT SCHINDLERS, THEN OTHERS IN LONDON IN 1994, VIA SUSAN BALKIN [JEWISH], ONE OF MY FRIENDS FROM THE JOB CENTRE & WHO FETCHED MY BABIES AND I TO SPEND A WONDERFUL PEACEFUL CHRISTMAS DAY WITH THEM ALL IN NORTH LONDON, THEN TWO FEMALES AT JCI IN 1986 AND THEN ALL OF THE ONES I LIVED AMONG AND WORKED WITH IN THE NETHERLANDS IN 2002 AND THEN SEEING OTHERS IN LONDON WORKING SO VERY HARD, YET ALSO BEING ABUSED BY THE BRITISH BOSSES, ETC. AND TO THIS DAY, I HAVE NEVER SEEN A SINGLE ONE OF THEM, INCLUDING THE ONE’S WHO END UP HOMELESS OR A BIT ANEBRIATED DUE TO THEIR HOEMLESSNESS AND NOW JOBLESSNESS, AND ARE THEN MADE TO DISAPPEAR, DO ANYBODY ANY HARM WHATSOEVER – THIS TOO IS THE GOSPEL TRUTH.

BUT I DO NOTICE THAT BRITAIN KEEPS DEVELOPING AND ENRICHING, FINANCIALLY SPEAKING – WITH MORE BUILDINGS AND RENOVATIONS, ETC, BUT SOUTHERN AFRICA AND POLAND HAS NOT – WHY, IT STANDS TO REASON AND IS MOST OBVIOUS AND EVIDENT NOW THAT I HAVE MADE THESE DISCOVERIES OF OUR HISTORY THAT THEY PSYCHOTICALLY AND INSANELY ALSO, KEEP HIDDEN FROM US. THE EVIL BEASTLINESS IS O SO EVIDENT!

JULLE MOET OOK SIEN HOE STERK DIE AAC, DE BEERS EN BRITSE REGEING BOTSWANA EN NAMIBIA OOK KONTROLEER – EK HOU GLAD NIE DAARVAN NIE, EN DIE SUID AFRIKAANSE REGEING MOET INSPRING OM DIT OOK OOR TE NEEM OM MET DAARDIE TREE SAAM TE WERK.

EK WIL OOK HE DAT SUIDER AFRIKA AND NOORD AFRIKA, SE MUSLIMS MENSE MOET OPHOU OM DIE CHRISTINNE EN HOMOSEKSUELE MENSE TE VERKRAG EN VERMOOR AND EN DAT DAAR N WET OPGESTEL MOET WORD DAT VIR 100 METERS SEE-UIT, MOET DAAR GEEN VAN HIERDIE OORSESE FISHING TRAWLERS PIRATES, WAT DUISENDE TONNE VIS VANUIT ONS WATERS UIT STEEL EN THAT OUR LOCAL FISHERMEN SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE CATCHING FISH FOR THE PEOPLE AND THEMSELVES, UT BELONG A PARTICULAR SIZE.

THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN REGIMES TALK ABOUT PIRACY, BUT THEY AND THE OTHER NOR ENRICHED REGIMES WORLDWIDE ARE THE TRUE MEANING OF THE WORD “PIRACY” AND RAPING OUR COASTS AND SEAS OF OUR FOOD AS WELL, WITHOUT SHARING WITH US.
I WOULD LIKE THEM TO ALSO SUPPLY SOUTHERN AFRICA, AFRICA, SOUTHERN AMERICA AND THE ENTIRE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE THAT THEY ARE STEALING FROM, WITH DECENT SHIPS TOO AS COMPENSATION AND TO SHARE THOSE FINANCIAL GAINS FROM THE 5+ DREDGING DIAMOND TRAWLERS THAT AAC/BE BEERS HAS OFF THE NAMIBIAN COAST, HAVING ALREADY STOLEN MILLIONS OF TONS OF DIAMONDS FROM US, THUS FAR.

I HAVE NO TIME TO EDIT THESE WRIINGS, SO DO EXCUSE ME, BUT I HOPE THAT I AM GETTING THE MESSAGES ACROSS, LOUD AND CLEAR, BECAUSE I HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF ALL OF THIS MAN-MADE HELL ON EARTH, WITH IT’S GREAT BRITISH CORRUPTION OF EVERYTHING INCLUDING ANY LAWS THAT ARE TO OUR ADVANTAGE, WHICH THEY ALSO THEN CORRUPT!

TONY SAID REPETITIVELY AND “WE ARE REACHING OUR TARGETS IN THE NHS” = WHICH IN FACT MEANS, THAT THEY ARE KILLING AS MANY TARKETS VIA THEIR MoD NHS SYSTEMATIC GENOCIDE OF TOXIC DRUGS EXPERIMENTATIONS, MIS-DIAGNOSES, UNTRUTHFUL REPORTS, MAIMING, INCARCERATING, DISAPPEARANCES AND KILLING OF BILLIONS OF DIV VICTIMS!

HIS AND THEIR OTHER INFAMOUS SAYINGS ARE “WE MUST BE SEEN TO BE DOING THE RIGHT THING” = MEANING, THEY MUST PRETEND [AS THEY ALWAYS DO] TO BE DOING THE RIGHT THING!

I AM ALSO TIRED OF HEARING “BRITISH AND AMERICAN INTERESTS”, WHEN THEY VERY CONVENIENTLY IGNORE MY AND OUR INTERESTS!

I TOO, FOR EXAMPLE, HAVE DONE MORE THAN THREE PERSON’S WORK ALREADY BY 2002, AND MORE THAN 100 BRITISH PERSON’S WORK, YET THEY ‘EDUCATE’ NAD INDOCTRINATE THEIR DOCTORS OF DEATH, WHO HAVE NO WORKING EXPERIENCE APART FROM THE MERCENARY WORK WHICH THE BRITISH FORCE AND TEACH EVERYBODY TO DO, WHO HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED THE OPPRESSION, DEPRESSION AND SUBJUGATORY LAWS AND PRACTICES OF THEM AND THEIR FOREBEARERS, WHO ARE YOUNG ENOUGH TO BE MY CHILDREN AND WHO HAVE NOT EVEN GIVEN BIRTH YET OR HAVE HAD CHILDREN TO BRING UP ON THEIR OWN AS I/WE HAVE DONE, SO SYSTEMATICALLY AND ON MERE FIRST IMPRESSIONS AND IN COLABORATION, DECLARE US AS “MENTALLY INSANE”, WHILE THEY ARE ALL THE SO-CALLED “SANE” ONES!

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

“THE RETURN OF THE TROOPS
[ISSUED BY TH ENEW COMMANDER- IN- CHIEF, LORD ROBERTS]

WILL YOU ALLOW ME TO MAKE AN APPEAL TO MY COUNTRYMEN AND WOMEN UPON A SUBJECT I HAVE VERY MUCH AT HEART, AND WHICH HAS BEEN OCCUPYING MY THOUGHTS FOR SOME TIME PAST?

ALL CLASSES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM HAVE SHOWN SUCH A KEEN INTEREST IN THE ARMY SERVING IN SOUTH AFRICA, AND HAVE BEEN SO MUNIFICENT IN THEIR EFFORTS TO SUPPLY EVERY NEED OF THAT ARMY, THAT I FEEL SURE
THEY MUST BE EAGERLY LOOKING FORWARD TO ITS RETURN, AND TO GIVING OUR BRAVE SOLDIERS AND SAILORS THE HEARTY WELCOME THEY SO DESERVE WHEN THEY GET BACK TO THEIR NATIVE LAND.

IT IS ABOUT THE CHARACTER OF THIS WELCOME AND THE EFFECT IT MAY HAVE ON THE REPUTATIONS OF THE TROOPS WHOM I HAVE BEEN SO PROUD TO COMMAND, THAT I AM ANXIOUS, AND THAT I VENTURE TO EXPRESS AN OPINION. MY SINCERE HOPE IS THAT THE WELCOME MAY NOT TAKE THE FORM OF “TREATING” THE MEN TO STIMULANTS IN THE PUBLIC-HOUSES OR IN THE STREETS, AND THUS LEAD THEM INTO EXCESSES WHICH MUST TEND TO DEGRADE THOSE WHOM THE NATION DELIGHTS TO HONOUR, NAD TO LOWER THE “SOLDIERS OF THE QUEEN” IN THE EYES OF THE WORLD – THAT WORLD WHICH HAS WITH UNDISGUISED ADMIRATION THE GRAND WORK THEY HAVE PERFORMED FOR THEIR SOVEREIGN AND THEIR COUNTRY.

FROM THE VERY KINDNESS OF THEIR HEARTS, THEIR INNATE POLITENESS, AND THEIR GRATITUDE FOR THE WELCOME ACCORDED THEM, IT WILL BE DIFFICULT FOR THE MEN TO REFUSE WHAT IS OFFERED TO THEM BY THEIR TOO GENEROUS FRIENDS. I THEREFORE, BEG EARNESTLY THAT THE BRITISH PUBLIC WILL REFRAIN FROM TEMPTING MY GALLANT COMRADES, BUT WILL RATHER AID THEM TO UPHOLD THE SPLENDID REPUTATION THEY HAVE WON FOR THE IMPERIAL ARMY.

I AM VERY PROUD THAT I AM ABLE TO RECORD, WITH THE MOST ABSOLUTE TRUTH, THAT TH ECONDUCT OF THIS ARMY FROM FIRST TO LAST HAS BEEN EXEMPLARY. NOT ONE CASE OF SERIOUS CRIME HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO MY NOTICE – INDEED, NOTHING THAT DESERVES THE NAME OF CRIME. THERE HAS BEEN NO NECESSITY FOR APPEALS OR ODRERS TO THE MEN TO BEHAVE PROPERLY. I HAVE TRUSTED IMPLICITLY TO THEIR OWN SOLIDARITY FEELINGS AND GOOD SENSE, AND I HAVE NOT TRUSTED IN VAIN. THEY BORE THEMSELVES LIKE HEROES ON THE BATTLEFIELD, ND LIKE GENTLEMEN ON ALL OTHER OCCASIONS.

* * * * * * *

I KNOW HOW KEEN MY FELLOW SUBJECTS WILL BE TO SHOW THEIR APPRECIATION OF THE UPRIGHT AND HONOURABLE BEARING AS WELL AS THE GALLANTRY OF OUR SAILORS AND SOLDIERS, AND I WOULD ENTREAT THEM, IN RETURN FOR ALL THESE GRAND MEN HAVE DONE FOR THEM. TO ABSTAIN FROM ANY ACTION THAT MIGHT BRING THE SMALLEST DISCREDIT UPON THOSE WHO HAVE SO WORTHILY UPHELD
THE CREDIT OF THEIR COUNTRY. I AM INDUCED TO MAKING THIS APPEAL FROM HAVING READ, WITH GREAT REGRET, THAT WHEN OUR TROOPS WERE LEAVING ENGLAND, AND PASSING THROUGH THE STREETS OF LONDON, THEIR INJUDICIOUS FRIENDS PRESSED LIQUOR UPON THEM, AND SHOVED BOTTLES OF SPIRITS INTO THEIR HANDS AND POCKETS – A MADE OF “SPEEDING THE PARTING” FRIEND WHICH RESULTED IN SOME VERY DISTRESSING AND DISCREDITABLE SCENES. I FERVENTLY HOPE THAT THERE MAY BE NO SUCH SCENES TO MAR THE BRIGHTNESS OF TH E WELCOME HOME.

ROBERTS.
HEADQUARTERS OF THE ARMY IN SOUTH AFRICA,
PRETORIA, SEPTEMBER 30th, 1900.”

**********
YES, SO THEIR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY [US] THEN AND WHICH STILL PREVAIL, GOES UNHEARD, UNREAD AND UNACCOUNTABLE FOR – WHY? BECAUSE THEY AND OTHERS OF THEIR ILK, WORSHIP SATAN AND BECOME HIM AND HIS ACTIONS!

AS UNCLE ARNOLD SELBY HAD SAID ABOUT ALL DESPOTS:
“MAKE THEM ACCOUNTABLE AND MADE TO BOOK!”

I HAVE FOUND PERSONALLY, THAT THEIR TRIBUNALS AND COURTS ARE ALL A FARCE TOO AND ONLY THERE TO PROTECT THEMSELVES – THE EVIL DOERS, FROM TOP TO BOTTEM!

GOD BLESS, LOVE
CLAUDINE